<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guerilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.branded07.com/2010/07/06/guerilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.branded07.com/2010/07/06/guerilla/</link>
	<description>Online web design portfolio of Rob Palmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.branded07.com/2010/07/06/guerilla/comment-page-1/#comment-7466</link>
		<dc:creator>jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.branded07.com/?p=594#comment-7466</guid>
		<description>I like the concept, but I see that typography on the site makes problems. Shading is ok in general, but if you use small font, normal weight and you drop shadow, it just looks too funky (on some backgrounds such as light blue). Readability is quite low though. Anyway I would go without shading for the content text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept, but I see that typography on the site makes problems. Shading is ok in general, but if you use small font, normal weight and you drop shadow, it just looks too funky (on some backgrounds such as light blue). Readability is quite low though. Anyway I would go without shading for the content text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

